How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?

29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Latvia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Chile

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Latvia

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chile rank

90th

Latvia rank

92nd

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Chile
Latvia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 92nd of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Latvia
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Chile
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Chile
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Chile or Latvia?: Chile, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Chile and Latvia?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Chile ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 92nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.