Namibia vs Uganda: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Namibia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Uganda
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Namibia rank
17th
Uganda rank
18th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Namibia
  • Uganda
00000196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uganda, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uganda ahead.

Namibia ranks 17th and Uganda ranks 18th of 166 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Uganda
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Uganda
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Uganda
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Uganda
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Namibia or Uganda?
Namibia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Namibia and Uganda?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uganda?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Uganda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Namibia ranks 17th and Uganda ranks 18th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/uganda/">Namibia vs Uganda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.