How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?

44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Namibia

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Uruguay

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Namibia rank

17th

Uruguay rank

19th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Namibia
Uruguay

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uruguay ahead.

Namibia ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 19th of 166 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Uruguay
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Namibia or Uruguay?: Namibia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Namibia and Uruguay?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?: 44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Namibia ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 19th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/uruguay/">Namibia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.