Sri Lanka vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Sri Lanka
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Saint Lucia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
108th
Saint Lucia rank
110th

Meat of cattle: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Saint Lucia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 108th and Saint Lucia ranks 110th of 166 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Saint Lucia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Sri Lanka or Saint Lucia?
Sri Lanka, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Saint Lucia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Sri Lanka ranks 108th and Saint Lucia ranks 110th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/sri-lanka/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/sri-lanka/st-lucia/">Sri Lanka vs Saint Lucia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 8,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.