Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 386,758 kt against 78,754 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 308,004 kt.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 6th of 190 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 48,943 kt | 125,284 kt | 76,340 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 77,834 kt | 143,529 kt | 65,695 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 63,609 kt | 160,215 kt | 96,606 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 68,489 kt | 188,595 kt | 120,105 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 73,720 kt | 234,067 kt | 160,348 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 72,372 kt | 311,187 kt | 238,815 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 69,114 kt | 377,561 kt | 308,447 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 386,758 kt against 78,754 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 308,004 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 6th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.