Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
78,754 kt
in 2023
Southern Asia
177,467 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Southern Asia rank
10th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Southern Asia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Southern Asia currently reports 177,467 kt against 78,754 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 98,713 kt.

That makes Southern Asia's figure about 2.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Southern Asia ranks 10th of 190 countries.

Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Southern Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 48,943 kt 183,640 kt 134,696 kt Southern Asia
1970s 77,834 kt 187,934 kt 110,099 kt Southern Asia
1980s 63,609 kt 192,448 kt 128,839 kt Southern Asia
1990s 68,489 kt 193,230 kt 124,740 kt Southern Asia
2000s 73,720 kt 182,843 kt 109,123 kt Southern Asia
2010s 72,372 kt 180,861 kt 108,488 kt Southern Asia
2020s 69,114 kt 179,694 kt 110,580 kt Southern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Southern Asia?
Southern Asia, at 177,467 kt against 78,754 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
98,713 kt, with Southern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Southern Asia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Southern Asia ranks 10th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Asia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.