Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia
67,292 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2,352 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
11th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
12th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 67,292 kt against 2,352 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 64,940 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 28.6 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th of 190 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 36,929 kt 1,122 kt 35,806 kt Australia
1970s 62,429 kt 1,410 kt 61,019 kt Australia
1980s 50,802 kt 1,662 kt 49,140 kt Australia
1990s 55,362 kt 1,495 kt 53,867 kt Australia
2000s 60,729 kt 981.14 kt 59,748 kt Australia
2010s 60,399 kt 1,251 kt 59,148 kt Australia
2020s 57,082 kt 2,027 kt 55,055 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Australia, at 67,292 kt against 2,352 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
64,940 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 11th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 12th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Australia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.