Australia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia
67,292 kt
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic
4,465 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
11th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
10th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 67,292 kt against 4,465 kt in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 62,827 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 15.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 10th of 190 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 36,929 kt 598.73 kt 36,330 kt Australia
1970s 62,429 kt 632.8 kt 61,796 kt Australia
1980s 50,802 kt 1,034 kt 49,768 kt Australia
1990s 55,362 kt 1,836 kt 53,526 kt Australia
2000s 60,729 kt 2,252 kt 58,477 kt Australia
2010s 60,399 kt 3,166 kt 57,233 kt Australia
2020s 57,082 kt 4,150 kt 52,931 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Australia, at 67,292 kt against 4,465 kt in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
62,827 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 11th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 10th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/">Australia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.