Melanesia vs Western Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Melanesia
802.89 kt
in 2023
Western Africa
94,169 kt
in 2023
Melanesia rank
14th
Western Africa rank
16th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Melanesia
  • Western Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Western Africa currently reports 94,169 kt against 802.89 kt in Melanesia, a difference of 93,366 kt.

That makes Western Africa's figure about 117.3 times Melanesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Western Africa has been ahead every year.

Melanesia ranks 14th and Western Africa ranks 16th of 20 countries.

Western Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia Western Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 705.58 kt 29,663 kt 28,957 kt Western Africa
1970s 1,119 kt 33,499 kt 32,380 kt Western Africa
1980s 1,319 kt 38,551 kt 37,232 kt Western Africa
1990s 1,494 kt 43,744 kt 42,250 kt Western Africa
2000s 1,461 kt 56,109 kt 54,648 kt Western Africa
2010s 1,078 kt 77,130 kt 76,051 kt Western Africa
2020s 777.8 kt 91,880 kt 91,103 kt Western Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Melanesia or Western Africa?
Western Africa, at 94,169 kt against 802.89 kt in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Melanesia and Western Africa?
93,366 kt, with Western Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Western Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and Western Africa rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Melanesia ranks 14th and Western Africa ranks 16th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs Western Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/melanesia/western-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/melanesia/western-africa/">Melanesia vs Western Africa: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.