Argentina vs Belgium: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Argentina
-2.58 % change on previous year
in 2023
Belgium
-2.69 % change on previous year
in 2023
Argentina rank
155th
Belgium rank
156th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Argentina
  • Belgium
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports -2.58 % change on previous year against -2.69 % change on previous year in Belgium, a difference of 0.11 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 155th and Belgium ranks 156th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Belgium Difference Ahead
2000s -0.7541 % change on previous year -0.9666 % change on previous year 0.2124 % change on previous year Argentina
2010s 1.14 % change on previous year -1.22 % change on previous year 2.37 % change on previous year Argentina
2020s -1.43 % change on previous year 0.5969 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Argentina or Belgium?
Argentina, at -2.58 % change on previous year against -2.69 % change on previous year in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Argentina and Belgium?
0.11 % change on previous year, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belgium?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Belgium rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Argentina ranks 155th and Belgium ranks 156th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Belgium: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/argentina/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/argentina/belgium/">Argentina vs Belgium: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.