Australia and New Zealand vs Ethiopia PDR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 3.95 % change on previous year against 3.57 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.38 % change on previous year.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 47th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.41 % change on previous year | -1.53 % change on previous year | 0.1213 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | -3.52 % change on previous year | 2.09 % change on previous year | 5.62 % change on previous year | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 0.7706 % change on previous year | 1.01 % change on previous year | 0.2387 % change on previous year | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | -2.35 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | 3.76 % change on previous year | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Australia and New Zealand or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 3.95 % change on previous year against 3.57 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 1992.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.38 % change on previous year, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia PDR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1992.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 47th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.