Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Bosnia and Herzegovina
6.13 % change on previous year
in 2023
Panama
6.69 % change on previous year
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
34th
Panama rank
31st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Panama
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 6.69 % change on previous year against 6.13 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.56 % change on previous year.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 34th and Panama ranks 31st of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 6.38 % change on previous year -3.15 % change on previous year 9.53 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s -2.37 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year 3.88 % change on previous year Panama
2010s 14.17 % change on previous year -0.3263 % change on previous year 14.5 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.7307 % change on previous year 0.984 % change on previous year 0.2533 % change on previous year Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Panama?
Panama, at 6.69 % change on previous year against 6.13 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
0.56 % change on previous year, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Panama rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 34th and Panama ranks 31st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/panama/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Panama: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.