Madagascar vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Madagascar
-3.76 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
-3.22 % change on previous year
in 2023
Madagascar rank
168th
Sweden rank
165th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Madagascar
  • Sweden
0100200196219922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports -3.22 % change on previous year against -3.76 % change on previous year in Madagascar, a difference of 0.54 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 168th and Sweden ranks 165th of 208 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 6 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7145 % change on previous year -3.28 % change on previous year 4 % change on previous year Madagascar
1970s 1.42 % change on previous year 0.9268 % change on previous year 0.4978 % change on previous year Madagascar
1980s -0.8026 % change on previous year -0.1938 % change on previous year 0.6088 % change on previous year Sweden
1990s 21.87 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year 20.76 % change on previous year Madagascar
2000s -0.0464 % change on previous year -0.301 % change on previous year 0.2546 % change on previous year Madagascar
2010s 0.1324 % change on previous year -0.553 % change on previous year 0.6853 % change on previous year Madagascar
2020s 1.85 % change on previous year -0.2223 % change on previous year 2.07 % change on previous year Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Madagascar or Sweden?
Sweden, at -3.22 % change on previous year against -3.76 % change on previous year in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Madagascar and Sweden?
0.54 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Madagascar ranks 168th and Sweden ranks 165th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/madagascar/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/madagascar/sweden/">Madagascar vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.