Mauritius vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Mauritius
-25.05 % change on previous year
in 2023
Palestine
-29.2 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
205th
Palestine rank
206th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Mauritius
  • Palestine
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -25.05 % change on previous year against -29.2 % change on previous year in Palestine, a difference of 4.15 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine ahead.

Mauritius ranks 205th and Palestine ranks 206th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 3.97 % change on previous year 8.74 % change on previous year 4.77 % change on previous year Palestine
2000s -4.5 % change on previous year 15.42 % change on previous year 19.92 % change on previous year Palestine
2010s 5.28 % change on previous year 0.3913 % change on previous year 4.88 % change on previous year Mauritius
2020s 36.97 % change on previous year -3.5 % change on previous year 40.47 % change on previous year Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Mauritius or Palestine?
Mauritius, at -25.05 % change on previous year against -29.2 % change on previous year in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Mauritius and Palestine?
4.15 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Mauritius ranks 205th and Palestine ranks 206th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/west-bank-and-gaza/">Mauritius vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.