Serbia and Montenegro vs Seychelles: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Serbia and Montenegro
20.22 % change on previous year
in 2005
Seychelles
19.97 % change on previous year
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro rank
13th
Seychelles rank
14th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Serbia and Montenegro
  • Seychelles
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 20.22 % change on previous year against 19.97 % change on previous year in Seychelles, a difference of 0.25 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Seychelles ahead.

Serbia and Montenegro ranks 13th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 208 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia and Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Difference Ahead
1990s 2.22 % change on previous year -0.2805 % change on previous year 2.5 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro
2000s -3.1 % change on previous year 0.8786 % change on previous year 3.98 % change on previous year Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Serbia and Montenegro or Seychelles?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 20.22 % change on previous year against 19.97 % change on previous year in Seychelles as of 2005.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Serbia and Montenegro and Seychelles?
0.25 % change on previous year, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Seychelles?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Serbia and Montenegro and Seychelles rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 13th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia and Montenegro vs Seychelles: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/serbia-and-montenegro/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity-annual-growth-rate/serbia-and-montenegro/seychelles/">Serbia and Montenegro vs Seychelles: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 13,291 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.