China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.4597 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Mauritius
0.2232 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
188th
Mauritius rank
189th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Mauritius
010203040196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.4597 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.2232 kg CO2eq/kg in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2365 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 2.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Mauritius ranks 189th of 189 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8717 kg CO2eq/kg 22.34 kg CO2eq/kg 21.47 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius
1970s 0.5231 kg CO2eq/kg 23.6 kg CO2eq/kg 23.08 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius
1980s 0.0886 kg CO2eq/kg 23.4 kg CO2eq/kg 23.31 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius
1990s 0.1048 kg CO2eq/kg 9.5 kg CO2eq/kg 9.4 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius
2000s 0.2131 kg CO2eq/kg 2.86 kg CO2eq/kg 2.64 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius
2010s 0.3947 kg CO2eq/kg 0.9348 kg CO2eq/kg 0.5401 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius
2020s 0.4436 kg CO2eq/kg 0.5519 kg CO2eq/kg 0.1083 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Mauritius?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.4597 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.2232 kg CO2eq/kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius?
0.2365 kg CO2eq/kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Mauritius rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Mauritius ranks 189th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/china-hong-kong-sar/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/china-hong-kong-sar/mauritius/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.