Botswana vs Martinique: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Botswana
-5.97 % change on previous year
in 2023
Martinique
-5.16 % change on previous year
in 2006
Botswana rank
168th
Martinique rank
166th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Botswana
  • Martinique
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Martinique currently reports -5.16 % change on previous year against -5.97 % change on previous year in Botswana, a difference of 0.81 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 168th and Martinique ranks 166th of 212 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Martinique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Martinique Difference Ahead
1960s 6.12 % change on previous year 10.84 % change on previous year 4.72 % change on previous year Martinique
1970s 12.49 % change on previous year -2.35 % change on previous year 14.84 % change on previous year Botswana
1980s 20.12 % change on previous year 1.06 % change on previous year 19.06 % change on previous year Botswana
1990s 1.42 % change on previous year -2.12 % change on previous year 3.54 % change on previous year Botswana
2000s -5.35 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year 6.6 % change on previous year Martinique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Botswana or Martinique?
Martinique, at -5.16 % change on previous year against -5.97 % change on previous year in Botswana as of 2006.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Botswana and Martinique?
0.81 % change on previous year, with Martinique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Martinique?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do Botswana and Martinique rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Botswana ranks 168th and Martinique ranks 166th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Martinique: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/botswana/martinique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/botswana/martinique/">Botswana vs Martinique: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,446 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.