Brazil vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Brazil
0.2112 % change on previous year
in 2023
Nauru
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Brazil rank
109th
Nauru rank
111th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Brazil
  • Nauru
-100-50050196219922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2112 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nauru, a difference of 0.2112 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 109th and Nauru ranks 111th of 212 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Nauru Difference Ahead
1990s 5.34 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 5.34 % change on previous year Brazil
2000s 4.94 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 4.94 % change on previous year Brazil
2010s 2.49 % change on previous year -11.11 % change on previous year 13.6 % change on previous year Brazil
2020s 2.09 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 2.09 % change on previous year Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Brazil or Nauru?
Brazil, at 0.2112 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Brazil and Nauru?
0.2112 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nauru?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Nauru rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Brazil ranks 109th and Nauru ranks 111th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/brazil/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/brazil/naoero/">Brazil vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,446 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.