Equatorial Guinea vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Equatorial Guinea
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Nauru
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
111th
Nauru rank
111th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Nauru
-100-75-50-25025196219922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nauru, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th and Nauru ranks 111th of 212 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Nauru Difference Ahead
1990s 3.7 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 3.7 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 1.22 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.15 % change on previous year -11.11 % change on previous year 12.26 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0651 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0651 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Equatorial Guinea or Nauru?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Equatorial Guinea and Nauru?
0 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nauru?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Nauru rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th and Nauru ranks 111th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/naoero/">Equatorial Guinea vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,446 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.