Nauru vs Tonga: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual

Nauru
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Tonga
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Nauru rank
111th
Tonga rank
111th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual over time

  • Nauru
  • Tonga
-2000200400196219922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Tonga, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tonga ahead.

Nauru ranks 111th and Tonga ranks 111th of 212 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 6.24 % change on previous year 6.24 % change on previous year Tonga
2000s 0 % change on previous year 1.19 % change on previous year 1.19 % change on previous year Tonga
2010s -11.11 % change on previous year 0.0458 % change on previous year 11.16 % change on previous year Tonga
2020s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual, Nauru or Tonga?
Nauru, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual between Nauru and Tonga?
0 % change on previous year, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tonga?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Tonga rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual?
Nauru ranks 111th and Tonga ranks 111th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Tonga: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/naoero/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/naoero/tonga/">Nauru vs Tonga: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 13,446 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.