Barbados vs Mauritius: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Barbados
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0001 kt per person
in 2023
Barbados rank
4th
Mauritius rank
6th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Barbados
  • Mauritius
0000196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Barbados
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Barbados
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Barbados
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Barbados
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Barbados
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Mauritius
2020s 0.0001 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Barbados or Mauritius?
Barbados, at 0.0001 kt per person against 0.0001 kt per person in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Barbados and Mauritius?
0 kt per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Mauritius rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Barbados ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Mauritius: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/barbados/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/barbados/mauritius/">Barbados vs Mauritius: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.