Botswana vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Botswana
0 kt per person
in 2023
Nauru
0 kt per person
in 2023
Botswana rank
162nd
Nauru rank
161st

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Botswana
  • Nauru
0000196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Botswana, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 162nd and Nauru ranks 161st of 168 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Botswana or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Botswana and Nauru?
0 kt per person, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Nauru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Nauru rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Botswana ranks 162nd and Nauru ranks 161st of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/botswana/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/botswana/naoero/">Botswana vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.