Cambodia vs Congo: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Cambodia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2023
Cambodia rank
137th
Congo rank
139th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Cambodia
  • Congo
000000196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Cambodia ranks 137th and Congo ranks 139th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Congo
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Cambodia or Congo?
Cambodia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Cambodia and Congo?
0 kt per person, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Congo rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Cambodia ranks 137th and Congo ranks 139th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Congo: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cambodia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cambodia/congo-rep/">Cambodia vs Congo: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.