Cambodia vs Nigeria: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Cambodia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Nigeria
0 kt per person
in 2023
Cambodia rank
137th
Nigeria rank
135th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Cambodia
  • Nigeria
00000196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Cambodia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Cambodia ranks 137th and Nigeria ranks 135th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Nigeria
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Nigeria
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Cambodia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Cambodia or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Cambodia and Nigeria?
0 kt per person, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Nigeria rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Cambodia ranks 137th and Nigeria ranks 135th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Nigeria: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cambodia/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cambodia/nigeria/">Cambodia vs Nigeria: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.