How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Namibia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cameroon vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Cameroon

0 kt per person

in 2023

Namibia

0 kt per person

in 2023

Cameroon rank

98th

Namibia rank

100th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

Cameroon
Namibia

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 100th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cameroon	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Cameroon
1970s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Cameroon
1980s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Namibia
1990s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Cameroon
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Namibia
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Cameroon
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Cameroon or Namibia?: Cameroon, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Cameroon and Namibia?: 0 kt per person, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Namibia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Namibia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?: Cameroon ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 100th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cameroon/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/cameroon/namibia/">Cameroon vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.