China vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions
China
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2023
China rank
99th
Latvia rank
101st
Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 101st of 168 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | China |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | China |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | China |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, China or Latvia?
- China, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between China and Latvia?
- 0 kt per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
- China ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 101st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.