China vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

China
0 kt per person
in 2023
Namibia
0 kt per person
in 2023
China rank
99th
Namibia rank
100th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • China
  • Namibia
00000196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

China ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 100th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Namibia
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Namibia
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Namibia
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person China
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Namibia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Namibia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, China or Namibia?
China, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between China and Namibia?
0 kt per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Namibia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
China ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 100th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/china/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/china/namibia/">China vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.