Ecuador vs Tunisia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2023
Tunisia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
12th
Tunisia rank
15th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tunisia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 12th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Tunisia
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Ecuador or Tunisia?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Ecuador and Tunisia?
0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Ecuador ranks 12th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.