Guatemala vs Nepal: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Guatemala
0 kt per person
in 2023
Nepal
0 kt per person
in 2023
Guatemala rank
81st
Nepal rank
79th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nepal
00000196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 79th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Guatemala
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Guatemala
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Guatemala
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Guatemala
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Guatemala
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Nepal
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Guatemala or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Guatemala and Nepal?
0 kt per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nepal rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Guatemala ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 79th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nepal: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/guatemala/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/guatemala/nepal/">Guatemala vs Nepal: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.