Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Guinea-Bissau
0 kt per person
in 2023
Serbia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
115th
Serbia rank
118th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Serbia
000000196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 115th and Serbia ranks 118th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Serbia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Serbia
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Guinea-Bissau or Serbia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?
0 kt per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Serbia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 115th and Serbia ranks 118th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/guinea-bissau/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/guinea-bissau/serbia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.