Kiribati vs Libya: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Kiribati
0 kt per person
in 2023
Libya
0 kt per person
in 2023
Kiribati rank
32nd
Libya rank
29th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Kiribati
  • Libya
0000196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kiribati, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 32nd and Libya ranks 29th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Kiribati
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Kiribati
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Kiribati
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Libya
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Kiribati
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Libya
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Kiribati or Libya?
Libya, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Kiribati and Libya?
0 kt per person, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Libya rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Kiribati ranks 32nd and Libya ranks 29th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Libya: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/kiribati/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/kiribati/libya/">Kiribati vs Libya: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.