Saint Lucia vs Sweden: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Saint Lucia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sweden
0 kt per person
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
60th
Sweden rank
59th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … capita CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Sweden
000000196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 60th and Sweden ranks 59th of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sweden
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Sweden
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saint Lucia
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saint Lucia
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saint Lucia
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Saint Lucia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Saint Lucia and Sweden?
0 kt per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Sweden?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Saint Lucia and Sweden rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Saint Lucia ranks 60th and Sweden ranks 59th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Lucia vs Sweden: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/st-lucia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/st-lucia/sweden/">Saint Lucia vs Sweden: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.