Angola vs Eritrea: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Angola
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
150th
Eritrea rank
153rd

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Angola
  • Eritrea
000000196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Angola ranks 150th and Eritrea ranks 153rd of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Eritrea
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Angola
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Angola or Eritrea?
Angola, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Angola and Eritrea?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eritrea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Angola and Eritrea rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Angola ranks 150th and Eritrea ranks 153rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Eritrea: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/angola/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/angola/eritrea/">Angola vs Eritrea: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.