Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Barbados
0.0348 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0288 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
3rd

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Barbados
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0348 kt per square kilometre against 0.0288 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.006 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 3rd of 168 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.015 kt per square kilometre 0.0051 kt per square kilometre 0.01 kt per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.0203 kt per square kilometre 0.0098 kt per square kilometre 0.0104 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0218 kt per square kilometre 0.0198 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.028 kt per square kilometre 0.0254 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0348 kt per square kilometre 0.0284 kt per square kilometre 0.0064 kt per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Barbados or Trinidad and Tobago?
Barbados, at 0.0348 kt per square kilometre against 0.0288 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.006 kt per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Barbados ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 3rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/barbados/trinidad-and-tobago/">Barbados vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.