Belarus vs Costa Rica: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
31st
Costa Rica rank
30th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belarus
  • Costa Rica
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0017 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 31st and Costa Rica ranks 30th of 168 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Belarus or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0017 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Belarus and Costa Rica?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Belarus ranks 31st and Costa Rica ranks 30th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Costa Rica: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/costa-rica/">Belarus vs Costa Rica: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.