Belarus vs Jordan: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belarus
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
31st
Jordan rank
29th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belarus
  • Jordan
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0017 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 31st and Jordan ranks 29th of 168 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Belarus or Jordan?
Jordan, at 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0017 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Belarus and Jordan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Belarus ranks 31st and Jordan ranks 29th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Jordan: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/jordan/">Belarus vs Jordan: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.