Belgium vs Kiribati: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Belgium
0.0037 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0.0024 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
15th
Kiribati rank
18th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Belgium
  • Kiribati
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0.0037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0024 kt per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0013 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.6 times Kiribati's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 15th and Kiribati ranks 18th of 168 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0025 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Belgium or Kiribati?
Belgium, at 0.0037 kt per square kilometre against 0.0024 kt per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Belgium and Kiribati?
0.0013 kt per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kiribati?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Kiribati rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Belgium ranks 15th and Kiribati ranks 18th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Kiribati: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belgium/kiribati/">Belgium vs Kiribati: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.