Botswana vs Iceland: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Botswana
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
164th
Iceland rank
162nd

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Botswana
  • Iceland
0000196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Botswana ranks 164th and Iceland ranks 162nd of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Botswana or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Botswana and Iceland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Iceland rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Botswana ranks 164th and Iceland ranks 162nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Iceland: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/botswana/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/botswana/iceland/">Botswana vs Iceland: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.