Botswana vs Montenegro: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Botswana
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
164th
Montenegro rank
165th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Botswana
  • Montenegro
0000196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Botswana ranks 164th and Montenegro ranks 165th of 168 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Botswana or Montenegro?
Botswana, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Botswana and Montenegro?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Botswana ranks 164th and Montenegro ranks 165th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Montenegro: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/botswana/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/botswana/montenegro/">Botswana vs Montenegro: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.