How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Burkina Faso

0.0003 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

0.0003 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

108th

Serbia rank

111th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

Burkina Faso
Serbia

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 111th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0.0003 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Burkina Faso or Serbia?: Burkina Faso, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Burkina Faso and Serbia?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Serbia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?: Burkina Faso ranks 108th and Serbia ranks 111th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/serbia/">Burkina Faso vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 26 September 2026

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.