Cuba vs Czechia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Cuba
0.0007 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia
0.0008 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
61st
Czechia rank
59th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Cuba
  • Czechia
000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.0008 kt per square kilometre against 0.0007 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 61st and Czechia ranks 59th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Cuba or Czechia?
Czechia, at 0.0008 kt per square kilometre against 0.0007 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Cuba and Czechia?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Czechia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Czechia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Cuba ranks 61st and Czechia ranks 59th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Czechia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cuba/czechia/">Cuba vs Czechia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.