Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Guinea-Bissau
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
109th
Serbia rank
111th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Serbia
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Serbia ranks 111th of 168 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Guinea-Bissau or Serbia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Serbia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Serbia ranks 111th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/serbia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.