Iceland vs Mauritania: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Iceland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
162nd
Mauritania rank
160th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
000000196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 9.6 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Iceland ranks 162nd and Mauritania ranks 160th of 168 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Iceland or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Iceland and Mauritania?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Iceland ranks 162nd and Mauritania ranks 160th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.