Latvia vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Latvia
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
125th
Nauru rank
126th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Latvia
  • Nauru
00000196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 125th and Nauru ranks 126th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Nauru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Latvia or Nauru?
Latvia, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Latvia and Nauru?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nauru?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Nauru rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Latvia ranks 125th and Nauru ranks 126th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/naoero/">Latvia vs Nauru: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.