Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Latvia
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
128th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
00000196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Latvia, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Latvia ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.