Norway vs Zimbabwe: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Norway
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
128th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Norway
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Norway ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 168 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Norway or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Norway and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Norway ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Zimbabwe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/norway/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/norway/zimbabwe/">Norway vs Zimbabwe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.