Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square

Serbia
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0003 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
111th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
110th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) … CO2eq AR5 square over time

  • Serbia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Serbia ranks 111th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 110th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Serbia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0003 kt per square kilometre against 0.0003 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Serbia ranks 111th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 110th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/serbia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/serbia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Serbia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,633 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.