Mauritania vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions

Mauritania
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Namibia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Mauritania rank
69th
Namibia rank
70th

Meat of chickens, fresh: Emissions … unit CO2eq AR5 Emissions over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
000000196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Mauritania
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per, Mauritania or Namibia?
Mauritania, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per between Mauritania and Namibia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per?
Mauritania ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 8,986 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.