Australia vs Belarus: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia
320.1 kt
in 2023
Belarus
349.55 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
39th
Belarus rank
36th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 349.55 kt against 320.1 kt in Australia, a difference of 29.45 kt.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 39th and Belarus ranks 36th of 193 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 216.94 kt 61.95 kt 154.99 kt Australia
2000s 258.63 kt 59.1 kt 199.53 kt Australia
2010s 280.61 kt 229.57 kt 51.04 kt Australia
2020s 316.46 kt 310.84 kt 5.62 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Belarus?
Belarus, at 349.55 kt against 320.1 kt in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Belarus?
29.45 kt, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 39th and Belarus ranks 36th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 13,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.