China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6664 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Rwanda
0.6828 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
95th
Rwanda rank
93rd

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Rwanda
01234196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.6828 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.6664 kg CO2eq/kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0164 kg CO2eq/kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3723 kg CO2eq/kg 3.13 kg CO2eq/kg 2.76 kg CO2eq/kg Rwanda
1970s 0.5052 kg CO2eq/kg 3.15 kg CO2eq/kg 2.64 kg CO2eq/kg Rwanda
1980s 0.3939 kg CO2eq/kg 2.55 kg CO2eq/kg 2.15 kg CO2eq/kg Rwanda
1990s 0.2093 kg CO2eq/kg 1.99 kg CO2eq/kg 1.78 kg CO2eq/kg Rwanda
2000s 0.0912 kg CO2eq/kg 2.26 kg CO2eq/kg 2.17 kg CO2eq/kg Rwanda
2010s 0.3969 kg CO2eq/kg 0.8768 kg CO2eq/kg 0.4799 kg CO2eq/kg Rwanda
2020s 0.6894 kg CO2eq/kg 0.6248 kg CO2eq/kg 0.0646 kg CO2eq/kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.6828 kg CO2eq/kg against 0.6664 kg CO2eq/kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda?
0.0164 kg CO2eq/kg, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/china-hong-kong-sar/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/china-hong-kong-sar/rwanda/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.